I got good kick out of this comment about my analysis of the debate:
Good coverage of Q&A and comments.
Donovan comes out of it looking pretty good.
Jackson somewhat bland and canned.
Weninger somewhere in between.
(Also, Jake demonstrates that perhaps he is more prepared to run for elected office than Weninger by offering a polished statement on the candidate's behalf.)
Like I said in George's comments, I, like many people, am more eloquent with the benefit of a keyboard and some time to think my comments through than I am in person. The fact that candidates put themselves out there for criticism while they think on their feet is admirable, and I certainly couldn't do as well in that setting.