I'm catching up on the rest of Wednesday's debate so I can finish yesterday's post on it, but had to stop and point your attention to a comment posted by reader Paul Babeu, police officer and President of the Chandler Law Enforcement Association (CLEA). The comment related to the Mark Pentz firing and provides background information from the perspective of the CLEA. The comment was posted on an old topic and can be found here. Excerpt:
CLEA President and Chandler Police Officer Paul Babeu came before your body to express his distrust in Mark Pentz and to publicly report Mr. Pentz’s threat made on February 22, 2006 during a meeting in his office. Mr. Pentz threatened Officer Babeu, while acting in his capacity as President of CLEA, to deny a proposed salary increase for Police Officers. Mr. Pentz said while pointing to the $3.5 million figure in the budget, “we do not have to give this to you, I can simply say No, so be careful what you say publicly and how you refer to me.”
So, I don't have an opinion as to the truth of what happened in a closed door meeting between two individuals. According to the same comment (which was the text of a letter sent to the Mayor and City Council), Mr. Pentz reported a difference of opinion as to the tone or intention of his comments.
I do find one thing interesting though. Becky Jackson has declined to state a position on whether she would vote to rehire Mark Pentz. Becky Jackson's husband is a police officer (in Phoenix). The officers' association is upset about a threat (real or perceived) to withhold a pay raise. You connect the dots.
Meanwhile, it's back to the replay of the debate. Tune in later for my completed analysis.